Media Double Standards: A Study in Hypocrisy

Watching Matt Lauer interview Jim (Sheldon Cooper) Parsons about his role on Broadway playing God. Matt giggles that some might not like him playing God, and Parsons replies “What can I say… haters gonna hate”. They both chuckle and continue chatting.

Gee. No mention he might “incite violence” by Shiite Baptists? So if some Catholic objects, THEY are the “haters”, not the one that offended them? Watched the news lately?

If the media didn't have double standards... they'd have none at all. — If the media didn’t have double standards… they’d have none at all.

Similarly, in a glowing review of Broadway hit “Book of Mormon”, the NYT says it’s “… blasphemous, scurrilous and more foul-mouthed than David Mamet on a blue streak. But trust me when I tell you that its heart is as pure as that of a Rodgers and Hammerstein show.”

Wait a sec. It’s “blasphemous“? Oh my. Aren’t you worried it’ll CAUSE violence?

The same New York Times is all over Pam Geller for her blatant and intentional “disrespect” of Islam… and the AP News crew is openly amazed she “has no regrets”.

Yeah, she’s just a troublemaker isn’t she? How DARE she think she can mock a religion? Right?

I’m NOT suggesting the self-crowned “elite” must temper their antics to avoid offending religions. The 1st amendment says they CAN. I don’t have to like it. I can change the channel, read a different paper, even boycott their sponsors… but I cannot MAKE them “respect” my religion, and I for sure cannot threaten violence.

Just trying to figure out how they can’t see the blatant hypocrisy of granting Islam a preferred status.

If the media didn’t have double-standards… they’d have none at all.

I'm Rob Jones... and I approve this message. — I’m Rob Jones… and I approve this message.

Charlie Hebdo NOTHING Like Pam Geller… Right?

The left (including the Charlie Hebdo crew) is insulted we’d compare what Pamela Geller did to Charlie Hebdo. They want us to know those were TOTALLY different.

– Charlie Hebdo drew “the prophet” as religious SATIRE.
– Geller did it to MOCK, RIDICULE and DERIDE a religion!

Ummmm……

Which conclusively proves someone needs a dictionary.

Muslim Attack: Garland TX

If I tell you MY religion prohibits profanity, therefore *I* won’t cuss, that’s legit.

If I tell you MY religion prohibits profanity, therefore YOU can’t cuss AND I can murder you if you do… your response might be a few choice 4 letter words and a call to the police.

That is the issue involved in the Garland attack, only instead of profanity, it was disrespect for the “prophet of Islam”. After years of protests in the US and other western countries by Islamists seeking to tell others to follow their own religious tenets or die… Pamela Geller’s group pushed back.

In response to Geller’s push back, to jihadi wannabes drove over 1000 miles with hi-capacity rifles and body armor to shoot up a meeting in Garland TX. They wounded 1 security guard, then both got killed by a Texas traffic cop with a pistol.

Oddly, the response of the US media is not to castigate the jihadi-boys, but to hound Geller… Why did you intentionally incite violence?

Newsflash: That is EXACTLY like telling a rape survivor she incited rape by wearing that dress.

We do NOT live under Sharia law. Islam does NOT dictate what we may say or do. If you want Sharia law… move to another country. We will push back.

Meanwhile, current score:

Texas – 2
Murdering Islamic Dirtbags – 0

CONCLUSIONS:

Don’t even think about telling US citizens we must follow your rules.
Don’t mess with Texas. We WILL shoot back.

That last part isn’t a threat. It’s a proven fact.

Welcome to Texas. It’s a Sharia Free Zone. Please set your watches forward 1400 years. Worship whatever you want, but don’t tell us to do it too. Thank you.

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this: